# CMake update

**URL:** https://discourse.itk.org/t/cmake-update/870
**Category:** Engineering
**Created:** [April 25, 2018, 9:04pm UTC](https://discourse.itk.org/t/cmake-update/870 "2018-04-25T21:04:18Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jhlegarreta](https://discourse.itk.org/user_avatar/discourse.itk.org/jhlegarreta/32/476_2.png) [@jhlegarreta](https://discourse.itk.org/u/jhlegarreta)
#### Post date: [April 26, 2018, 6:37am UTC](https://discourse.itk.org/t/cmake-update/870/2 "2018-04-26T06:37:32Z")

</div>

True, this was mentioned in the [minimum cmake version](https://discourse.itk.org/t/minimum-cmake-version-update/585/) thread at least.

**I can update that in ITK, ITKWikiExamples, and the remote modules** , given that I was last in modifying them concerning the [noncopyable](https://discourse.itk.org/t/noncopyable/648) topic.

So whenever the community gives green light to it, I’ll submit the patches. Not before next week.

Once that done, I can update the WikiExamples `CMakeLists` in the wiki itself. However, as discussed [here](https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITKWikiExamples/pull/10), this will still not be consistent with the tarballs located in Bill’s repository, and rather than sync’ing all wiki examples to actually match their current counterparts in [GitHub](https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITKWikiExamples) (which is unfeasible in practice now), the big challenge would be transitioning the remaining ones to [Sphinx](https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITKExamples) so that we avoid the current sync’ing burden.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.itk.org/t/cmake-update/870)._
